From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-26 18:33:14
Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Douglas Gregor wrote:
>> Boost regression test failures
>> Report time: 2005-06-26T15:40:21Z
>> 717 failures in 22 libraries:
> Don't know what happened, but there are a few new CW-8.3 regressions now...
>> converter_test: cw-8_3
>> udt_support_test: cw-8_3
> Pass for me locally.
>> seq: cw-8_3
> Not easily testable on it's own, as there's no test/Jamfile for BPP.
>> decay_test: cw-8_3
> This change:
> Seems to have caused it. But Dave's comment on the change doesn't say
> which "Broken compiler" the change was for.
Sorry, it was one of the VC++s; 6 I think. I figured omitting the
void would work anywhere. Well, you're probably safe by optionally
including the void when on CW, yes?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk