Re: [boost] Boost regression notification (2005-06-26)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-26 19:50:39

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>
>> <http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/type_traits/test/decay_test.cpp?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&sortby=date>
>> <http://tinyurl.com/ap7uc>
>>
>> Seems to have caused it. But Dave's comment on the change doesn't say 
>> which "Broken compiler" the change was for.
>
> Sorry, it was one of the VC++s; 6 I think.  I figured omitting the
> void would work anywhere.  Well, you're probably safe by optionally
> including the void when on CW, yes?

Aw, there's no way that test could work without PTS. I have no clue
what I was thinking when I checked in those changes.  Reverted, with
apologies.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com