|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-26 21:03:16
Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Andy Little wrote:
>> "Anis Benyelloul" <benyelloul_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>
>>>>You would need to change the licence for boost.
>>>
>>>Ahem.. I assume you're talking about the manual, because the code
>>>*is* under the Boost Licence. And about the manual, I don't recall having
>>>read something that forbids FDL for manuals ... maybe be I missed it ?
>>
>>
>> Ok .. I dont know how boost sees this.
>
> I think it should apply to both and this should be made clear.
Agreed. Anything else will just undermine the purpose of having a
unified license.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk