From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 16:54:17
Chris Uzdavinis wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the
>>former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading
>>Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess
>>(and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).
> If the highest released Borland compiler is 0x570, why do you suggest
> testing for "below 0x600"? Rounding up may inadvertantly include
> future compilers that don't need such workarounds.
There was a (much more compliant preview) version 0x600, once... And AFAIK 0x565
was released /after/ 0x570.
Btw. I have 5.6.5 installed, in case someone needs testing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk