From: Chris Uzdavinis (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 15:33:03
Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
> It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the
> former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading
> Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess
> (and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).
If the highest released Borland compiler is 0x570, why do you suggest
testing for "below 0x600"? Rounding up may inadvertantly include
future compilers that don't need such workarounds.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk