Boost logo

Boost :

From: Chris Uzdavinis (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 15:33:03


Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:

> It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the
> former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading
> Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess
> (and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).

If the highest released Borland compiler is 0x570, why do you suggest
testing for "below 0x600"? Rounding up may inadvertantly include
future compilers that don't need such workarounds.

-- 
Chris

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk