Re: [boost] [function types] New tag type logic [update]

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-30 18:17:45

Rob Stewart wrote:
> From: Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]>
> 
>>>Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>>>>  When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>>>>>  variations of one aspect. There are special variations which make this
>>>>>  possible. These are called *abstract variations*.
>>>>
>>But the term "variation" is used too often in this sentence.
>>
>>     When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>>     variations of one aspect. There are special, *abstract* variations for that.
> 
> 
> I'll grant that it is repetitious, but I don't care for your
> change.  Here's another try:
> 
>    When classifying types it is often necessary to match against
>    several variations of one aspect.  Special, *abstract*
>    variations make this possible.
> 

Nice! Thanks!