Re: [boost] [function types] New tag type logic [update]

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-30 21:49:29

Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Rob Stewart wrote:
>> From: Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]>
>> 
>>>>Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>  When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>>>>>>  variations of one aspect. There are special variations which make this
>>>>>>  possible. These are called *abstract variations*.
>>>>>
>>>But the term "variation" is used too often in this sentence.
>>>
>>>     When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>>>     variations of one aspect. There are special, *abstract* variations for that.
>> 
>> 
>> I'll grant that it is repetitious, but I don't care for your
>> change.  Here's another try:
>> 
>>    When classifying types it is often necessary to match against
>>    several variations of one aspect.  Special, *abstract*
>>    variations make this possible.
>> 
>
> Nice! Thanks!

Except that "this" needs an antecedent.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Antecedent Nanny