Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-11 12:26:59

Next message: Andrey Melnikov: "[boost] Boost.Optional advantages"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] Lack of good brief descriptions is a marketing issue"
In reply to: Jost, Andrew: "Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state"
Next in thread: Jost, Andrew: "Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state"

"Jost, Andrew" <Andrew_Jost_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:8F7931C35114FA4F9D25E1A9299408E20276DFA7_at_SVR-ORW-EXC-06.mgc.mentorg.com...
>> Boost.Optional has some interaction with (including
>> initialization from) boost::none, which seems to correspond
>> to your "undef".
>
> Good point, but I would also like to see overloaded == and != operators
> using boost::none.
>
That is already supported.

Fernando Cacciola
SciSoft

Next message: Andrey Melnikov: "[boost] Boost.Optional advantages"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] Lack of good brief descriptions is a marketing issue"
In reply to: Jost, Andrew: "Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state"
Next in thread: Jost, Andrew: "Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk