Re: [boost] Defining compilers suggestion

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-14 13:59:43

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> You could also do
>>
>>      BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS(3,2,3))
>>      BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS_EQ(3,2,3))
>>      BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, TESTED_AT(3,2,3))
>>      ...
>
> Ick; why use a name to stand in for the operator when we can use the
> operator directly?

For uniform treatment of comparisons and TESTED_AT. Maybe there's some other way
to do the same thing.

Jonathan