Re: [boost] singleton design plan

From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-28 18:53:04

Rob Stewart wrote:

> According to the grammar, Comeau is wrong:
>
> [...]

I think comeau just complained about not having a default constructor 
explicitly defined, and in order to define a constructor I had to give 
the class a name.  I'm not sure why it wanted the default constructor to 
be explicitly defined, though.

> That may cause grief to those using the -Wshadow option of recent 
> vintage GCC's.

Perhaps I can just provide the name for comeau compilations then.

-Jason