Re: [boost] [Serialization] Boost regression notification (2005-07-31)

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-31 15:06:45

On Jul 31, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
 > 31 failures in 1 library:
>   serialization (31)
>
> |serialization|
>   test_class_info_load_text_warchive_dll:  vc-6_5
>   test_const_load_fail1:  borland-5_6_4
>   test_const_load_fail1_nvp:  borland-5_6_4
>   test_const_load_fail2:  borland-5_6_4
>   test_const_load_fail2_nvp:  borland-5_6_4
>   test_const_save_fail1:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>   test_const_save_fail2:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>   test_const_save_fail3:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>   test_demo_fast_archive_dll:  vc-6_5
>   test_demo_pimpl_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>   test_demo_portable_archive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  intel-win32-8_1  
> intel-win32-9_0
>   test_demo_shared_ptr_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>   test_map_binary_archive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>   test_map_text_archive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>   test_map_text_warchive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>   test_mult_archive_types_dll:  vc-6_5
>   test_non_intrusive_binary_archive:  vc-8_0
>   test_shared_ptr_132_xml_archive_dll:  intel-win32-8_1

I've gone through and marked up all of these, except this one strange 
regression:

   http://tinyurl.com/ajprh

Looking at the output of the test, I don't even seeing an error. To 
make things more interesting, the other vc-8_0 tester isn't having any 
problem. Ideas, anyone?

        Doug