Re: [boost] [Serialization] Boost regression notification(2005-07-31)

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-31 19:39:49

"Douglas Gregor" <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:c9d9f5edd926cc1d7f2ab2228d9754bd_at_cs.indiana.edu...
>
> On Jul 31, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > 31 failures in 1 library:
>>   serialization (31)
>>
>> |serialization|
>>   test_class_info_load_text_warchive_dll:  vc-6_5
>>   test_const_load_fail1:  borland-5_6_4
>>   test_const_load_fail1_nvp:  borland-5_6_4
>>   test_const_load_fail2:  borland-5_6_4
>>   test_const_load_fail2_nvp:  borland-5_6_4
>>   test_const_save_fail1:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>>   test_const_save_fail2:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>>   test_const_save_fail3:  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0
>>   test_demo_fast_archive_dll:  vc-6_5
>>   test_demo_pimpl_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>   test_demo_portable_archive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  intel-win32-8_1
>> intel-win32-9_0
>>   test_demo_shared_ptr_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>   test_map_binary_archive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>   test_map_text_archive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>   test_map_text_warchive_dll:  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>   test_mult_archive_types_dll:  vc-6_5
>>   test_non_intrusive_binary_archive:  vc-8_0
>>   test_shared_ptr_132_xml_archive_dll:  intel-win32-8_1
>
> I've gone through and marked up all of these, except this one strange
> regression:
>
>   http://tinyurl.com/ajprh
>
> Looking at the output of the test, I don't even seeing an error. To
> make things more interesting, the other vc-8_0 tester isn't having any
> problem. Ideas, anyone?

Different builds of the compiler? Because Microsoft is issuing monthly 
community updates, it is really easy for testers to diverge as to what build 
they are running.

--Beman