From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 09:54:13
Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >> Also, IIUC, this and other mentions of null terminated strings need
>> >> to be removed now.
>> > yes, when I get the time or when somebody volunteers (1.33 is out of the
>> > question).
>> If the code has changed, you have to change the docs before 1.33.
>> Otherwise, you have to do the change after 1.33. I assumed that the
>> former was the case.
> the former is the case.
Does everybody think it's okay to release 1.33 docs with the false
promise that Boost.Range includes special null-terminated string
support? That seems very wrong to me, and so avoidable!
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk