Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 09:54:13

Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> >> Also, IIUC, this and other mentions of null terminated strings need
>> >> to be removed now.
>> >
>> > yes, when I get the time or when somebody volunteers (1.33 is out of the
>> > question).
>> If the code has changed, you have to change the docs before 1.33.
>> Otherwise, you have to do the change after 1.33. I assumed that the
>> former was the case.
> the former is the case.

Does everybody think it's okay to release 1.33 docs with the false
promise that Boost.Range includes special null-terminated string
support? That seems very wrong to me, and so avoidable!

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at