From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 14:09:37
David Abrahams writes:
> Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> >> Also, IIUC, this and other mentions of null terminated strings need
>>> >> to be removed now.
>>> > yes, when I get the time or when somebody volunteers (1.33 is out of the
>>> > question).
>>> If the code has changed, you have to change the docs before 1.33.
>>> Otherwise, you have to do the change after 1.33. I assumed that the
>>> former was the case.
>> the former is the case.
> Does everybody think it's okay to release 1.33 docs with the false
> promise that Boost.Range includes special null-terminated string
> support? That seems very wrong to me, and so avoidable!
Seems very wrong to me as well, especially since the fix could be as
easy as including a prominent one-sentence warning on the library's
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk