From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 15:46:03
On 04 Aug 2005 16:59:36 +0200, Peter Simons <simons_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > if you ultimately want to provide both a blocking and
> > non-blocking API it is less difficult to imagine a
> > non-blocking API over a blocking API than the other way
> > around.
> I take it you meant the opposite? A non-blocking API can be
> trivially wrapped to block, but the other way round doesn't work
> too well.
For what I understood, that's exactly what he said.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida Developer from synergy and Computer Science student from State University of Campinas(UNICAMP). Unicamp: http://www.ic.unicamp.br Synergy: http://www.synergy.com.br "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk