Boost logo

Boost :

From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-05 18:49:15


On 8/5/05, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> I don't think that's a valid strict weak ordering criterion, because
> for two classes unrelated by inheritance it produces true in either
> argument order.
>

Is it possible to use a non-strict weak ordering criterion with
mpl::sort and have it sorted?
All that I care is that the deriveds be after its bases in this
sequence. Or is there any better way to accomplish this?

Thanks,
Felipe.

>
> HTH,
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
   Felipe Magno de Almeida
Developer from synergy and Computer Science student from State
University of Campinas(UNICAMP).
Unicamp: http://www.ic.unicamp.br
Synergy: http://www.synergy.com.br
"There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk