Re: [boost] New boost webpage

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-08 20:12:43

Rob Stewart writes:
> From: Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>
>> Rob Stewart writes:
>> > I don't find the enlarged text an improvement, particularly.  In
>> > a sense, the enlarged size makes that text compete too much with
>> > the body text on the left 2/3.
>> 
>> Well, the navigation links are supposed to be easily identifiable at
>> first glance. Besides, they don't really compete with the body text in
>
> They should be easily identifiable when you look at that side of
> the page, but they shouldn't draw your attention to that side
> immediately.  The larger text does the latter.

>From a seasoned visitor's standpoint, I consider this to be a feature:
I read the text only once, and the rest of the time what I want is to
find the navigation links instantly. Falimiarity with the site's
layout doesn't help as much as one would hope for here because usually
you regularly visit more than just one site.

>
>> a sense that once you start reading it, you concentrate all your
>> attention on the flow and simply don't notice what's around it (much
>> as you don't notice the ads and the likes when you are reading a news
>> site). IMO from usability standpoint the larger size is an
>> improvement.
>
> Did you find the smaller text somehow unreadable?

Yes, I find that I actually have to read what the links say before
clicking, while with the larger text I recognize what I'm looking for
"instantly".

>
>> > I like the consistent treatment of links.  I don't like the
>> > selected color as the contrast is too low.
>> 
>> FWIW, it works for me. The links are clearly distinguishable from the
>> plain text.
>
> Yes, they are distinguishable.  The problem is, they are harder
> to read because of the lower contrast.

Lower contrast between the links and the text or the links and the
background?

>
>> > The subtle difference for visited links is fine, but the selected
>> > color has even less contrast, so it is a poor choice.
>> 
>> Again, it's clearly distinguishable, which IMO makes it an acceptable
>> choice (although may be not the best one).
>
> Readability is of great concern, not just distinguishability.

No argument here.

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering