From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-12 20:30:31
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> There wasn't really enough data to pin anything down. Its going to take a
> significant effort to gather such data. Which raises an intereing question:
> Boost has a strong infrastructure for testing library correctness. This
> infrastructure permits comparison of libraries accross different
> If someone had nothing else to do, it would be interesting to develop a
> parallel infrastructure for testing performance.
> questions are regularly posted to the list regarding performance of all the
> libraries. Usually, any data is largely anecdotal. To really address
> these questions, something more is needed.
Not long ago I built the raw facilities into bjam that are needed for
measuring the execution time of any build step (including one that
runs programs). I need to do performance testing for the MTL rewrite,
so I'll be using that.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk