|
Boost : |
From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-15 12:54:47
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:15:54 +1000 (EST)
Christopher Kohlhoff <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Wow! Given the encouraging response both on and off list, I guess I'd
> like to kick things off in turning asio into a serious proposal for
> Boost. I'll post a message in a day or two outlining some of the areas
> where I believe it needs refinement and where it could benefit from
> others' expertise.
I know you want a header only library, but others have voiced the need
to not pollute the namespace with all the stuff from various network
library header files and such. This almost requires a library
implemented behind the interface.
Along that line, compiles are very slow, probably due to the all-header
implementation.
I looked at asio a while ago, and remember having some other issues, but
do not really recall them at this moment.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk