Re: [boost] warning C4275 with VC++ (non dll-interface class...) (again)

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-23 01:14:01

Luke Elliott wrote:

> I was wondering why boost libraries don't do something like:
> 
> class positional_options_description {
>      public:
>          BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DECL positional_options_description();
>          BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DECL void add(const char* name, int
> max_count);
> ...
> };
> 
> instead of:
> 
> class BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DECL positional_options_description {
>      public:
> max_count);
> ...
> };
> 
> in order to remove the irritating C4275 warning? i.e. only declspec
> public, protected members (and any private members invoked from inline
> methods).

Well, I did what I considered to be the standard thing. I have no idea
what's C4275 warning is, and why adding declspecs to each method is a good
idea. Can you explain?

- Volodya