From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-29 00:44:54
On 8/26/05, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I'm also concerned with (in my opinion) needed compatibility with
> Embedded C++. C++ will grow a lot in this area and obviously, threads
> are very used. Embedded C++ specification
> (http://www.caravan.net/ec2plus/) avoids templates and exceptions, so we
> need to think some alternatives (apart from exceptions, just like
> iostreams do) to do error checking. And provide some low-resource
> specializations or alternatives to the full-scale C++ threading.
I dont that the embedded C++ should be a concern. It is just a too
small subset of C++, that I think would avoid better solutions for
"backward"(since I think EC++ is a step back) compatibility. I even
agree with Bjarne Stroustrup FAQ about EC++:
> P.D.: I plan to continue Shmem development although, I will have less
> time to work on it because of this threading work. I plan to upload a
> new snapshot soon.
I hadnt time to see Shmem yet, but I'm trying to find some time to
take a look at it. It really seems interesting and is certainly very
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida Developer from synergy and Computer Science student from State University of Campinas(UNICAMP). Unicamp: http://www.ic.unicamp.br Synergy: http://www.synergy.com.br "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk