From: Matt Hurd (matt.hurd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-30 18:07:19
>On 31/08/05, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Matt, can you distil this test case a little more please:
> * Get rid of the macros so we can read the code :-)
> * Don't use Boost.Test for the tests, it's *not* thread safe, and bad things
> may be happening in there.
> * Don't declare variables as function-static: it's not thread safe. I'm not
> sure if this is an issue or not from reading the code, with those macros in
> place it's hard to see which bits are getting called by multiple threads.
> Many thanks!
Sure thing, I'll do that a bit later today.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk