Re: [boost] [mpl] broken count and at metafunctions

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-31 11:58:49

Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:

> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >
>> > I'd go with 'key_count' for the latter, but otherwise I agree with the
>> > analysis.
>> 
>> "count_key" sounds more natural to me, FWIW.
>
> I'd say it isn't a matter of whether it sounds "natural" but that
> this is an algorithm and should be described by a verb or verbal
> phrase.  

That's a little less clear in a pure functional system.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com