From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-01 07:57:54
>From: Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]>
>Subject: Re: [boost] [boost thread rework] New version uploaded to
>Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:06:27 +0200
>Matt Hurd schrieb:
>>>I'd really like to know that the existing library is being actively
>>>and conscientiously maintained before we move on to bigger and better
>>Perhaps not too much to ask for...
>>I tend to agree with David's sentiment. I'd be happy to start a
>>simplification and restructure of the basic primitives. The code
>>should be restructured into platform specific implementations, like
>>boost has elsewhere (such as the atomic inc for shared_prt), as the
>>current code I find a little tricky to read.
>>With such a restructure the various platforms could have different
>>maintainers to eliminate a bit of the difficulty of trying to support
>>such a cross platform library.
>This is the second time I see this happen :-(
>Bill Kempf, the original author of the library silently disappeared.
>The reason always was unclear to me.
And to all of us, since we haven't been able to get in touch with him.
>It looks to me as if he was
>disappointed that the C++ comitee did not accept anything of the
>threading work so far. Please correct me if this are wrong impressions.
As far as I know, nothing was ever proposed to the C++ committee, so I don't
think this isn't the reason. I could be wrong, though.
>At least I learned this from digging through the muddy waters of the
>mailing list archive.
>Next Michael Glassford appeared, trying hard to improve on the
>library. I don't know what happened. I don't know whether he
>underestimated the task or he is beeing teared apart by something
>different. At a minimum I would like to hear what he has to say
>about the new plans. (I also BCC this to him directly.)
I've been chronically short of time all along. I also recently changed jobs
and my interests are moving in other directions. I also don't currently have
a machine configured to work on Boost.
I'm glad to see interest in improving Boost.Threads, and will be glad to
give what help I can, which is obviously pretty limited.
I did have some ideas for Boost.Threads that I was working on before
changing jobs; perhaps I can refresh myself on them at some point and
present the ideas for what they're worth.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk