From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-01 09:31:14
"Michael Glassford" <glassfordm_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>It looks to me as if he was disappointed that the C++ comitee did
>>not accept anything of the threading work so far. Please correct me
>>if this are wrong impressions.
> As far as I know, nothing was ever proposed to the C++ committee, so I don't
> think this isn't the reason. I could be wrong, though.
You are not wrong.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk