From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-01 13:31:20
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:09:53AM -0700, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Pavol Droba wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM -0700, Eric Niebler wrote:
> >>So, is Boost.Range broken, or is this another problem with the
> > Documentation says, that boost::begin() implementation calls unqualified boost_range_begin().
> > Therefore this is the function, one needs to implement to make support for his/her class.
> > http://www.boost.org/libs/range/doc/boost_range.html#Semantics
> Um, where in the documentation does it say that? I followed the link,
> but I see no mention of boost_range_begin().
Oops. This is realy bad. I was actualy digging in the implementation. Then I was
tring to find it in the documentation.
And it seems, that I have not read it properly.
So all I said about boost_range_begin() is valid. But the documentation is perfectly
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk