From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-01 17:04:46
Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Oops. This is realy bad. I was actualy digging in the
> implementation. Then I was tring to find it in the documentation.
> And it seems, that I have not read it properly.
> So all I said about boost_range_begin() is valid. But the
> documentation is perfectly misleading.
Or maybe the documentation is right and the library implementation is
Also, try the same exercise for a "broken compiler." Follow the
directions. Does it work?
Now how do you write a range that's portable to both broken and
conforming compilers without substantial #ifdef-ing?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk