Re: [boost] [scope_guard] New version consideration

From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-06 13:50:37

>> Shouldnt the "CHandler" use operator() insted of on_exception? I
>> think it would make it more generic.
>
> The "CHandler" isn't necessarilly an object class. It might be an
> abstract interface, for example. And making an interface of virtual
> operator()'s isn't very convenient to my mind.

But havinng thought of it for a while, you may be right here. At last, a 
small functor-like adaptor may be made to deal with interfaces. I shall 
change it in the next version.