From: Joel Eidsath (jeidsath_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-07 08:06:01
Andras Erdei wrote:
>i think he is suggesting that radix representation may
>be good (efficient etc) for integers, but is certainly
>not a good way to represent non-integers
float is worthless, huh?
>num/den pairs are much better, and there are several
>other alternatives (representations based on exponential
>functions, continued fraction expansions, composition of
>linear fractional transformations etc)
I don't think that you have a good conception of the effciency costs
involved in doing large number math with those things.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk