Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 07:25:54

Next message: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive"
Previous message: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive"
Next in thread: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Neal Becker: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Alex Besogonov: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Neal Becker: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Maybe reply: David Gruener: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Maybe reply: Martin Bonner: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"

Hi,

On the Boost.Build list we were just discussing the fact that some
people otherwise inclined towards Boost have chosen Scons over
Boost.Build. It would be useful for us to understand some of the
reasons why, if some of you wouldn't mind letting us know. No flames,
please!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive"
Previous message: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive"
Next in thread: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Neal Becker: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Alex Besogonov: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Neal Becker: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Maybe reply: David Gruener: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Reply: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"
Maybe reply: Martin Bonner: "Re: [boost] Scons users?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk