From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 23:38:00
Simon Buchan wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>Simon Buchan wrote:
>>>What's wrong with GCC 4?
>>It doesn't exist in MinGW form yet, not even in beta. So it would be
>>wrong of me to assume that it will have the same support.
> I compiled proper GNU GCC 4.0.0, and just installed over my MinGW
> precompiled package (after backing up, of course :D), so it just uses
> the same headers (exluding GNU's of course, no problems yet). I'm pretty
> sure the MS __int64 ext. is a GCC thing, not a MinGW thing. Im just
> guessing, though, since this is my work computer. Still, I _seriously_
> doubt that the MinGW guys (and/or girls?) will pull any of those in
> future releases.
Well one data point is enough in this case. Since I first leaned toward
making the assumption in the first place.
So back to the original patch. Doug? John? Bronek? Is it OK? I guess
eventually I'll assume the answer is yes ;-)
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk