From: Simon Buchan (simon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 22:03:43
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Simon Buchan wrote:
>>Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>>+#if defined(__MINGW32__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || ((__GNUC__ == 3) &&
>>>>(__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)))
>>>Oops, that should be:
>>>+#if defined(__MINGW32__) && (__GNUC__ == 3) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)
>>What's wrong with GCC 4?
> It doesn't exist in MinGW form yet, not even in beta. So it would be
> wrong of me to assume that it will have the same support.
I compiled proper GNU GCC 4.0.0, and just installed over my MinGW
precompiled package (after backing up, of course :D), so it just uses
the same headers (exluding GNU's of course, no problems yet). I'm pretty
sure the MS __int64 ext. is a GCC thing, not a MinGW thing. Im just
guessing, though, since this is my work computer. Still, I _seriously_
doubt that the MinGW guys (and/or girls?) will pull any of those in
PS: do I need to put line ends on these messages? Thunderbird auto
flows to 80 columns, does it also add breaks?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk