|
Boost : |
From: Kevin Wheatley (hxpro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-14 04:14:57
Kon Lovett wrote:
> Maybe use the
>
> long /* free blocks avail to non-superuser */
>
> field rather than the
>
> long f_bfree; /* free blocks in fs */
>
f_bavail; is not a documented feature of IRIX's statfs but actually
thinking about it it would be better to use statvfs() which does
(http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/statvfs.h.html)
However do all OS's have a concept of two different answers to how
much free space there is, and what would an application developer want
to know, if I'm writing a 'df' style application then I might want
both. I guess the available space for the user is more interesting..
but then you get into quota's etc.
Kevin
-- | Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this | | Senior Technology | My employer for certain | | And Network Systems Architect | Not even myself |
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk