From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-16 01:07:27
On 9/14/05 11:33 AM, "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jeff Flinn wrote:
>> That begs the question: do we need Boost.Regex's interface? I'm not up to
>> date on Boost.Regex's status as far as TR1, so maybe it's a done deal
>> already. But it seems to me that xpressive has a broader application domain,
>> and may be a better candidate?
> It's a done deal. The Boost.Regex interface has already been accepted as
> the TR1 regex interface.
It wouldn't be the first time an interface was accepted into C++ that seemed
great at the time, but possibly better alternates were discovered later....
(e.g. valarray vs. expression templates, vector<bool> vs. separate type)
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk