From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-17 13:31:55
Sashan Govender schrieb:
>Perhaps a lock-free implementation of the STL might be a good idea?
I am afraid that it will be very hard to push it that far.
Also I am not sure if I would want that at all. Isn't it the
case that lock-free algorithms are much slower in the
But having a bag of lockfree algorithms would definitely be a big win.
BTW.: As I have stumbled over "lock-free " and "wait-free".
Is it true that the use of a user space "spin lock" despite its name
belongs to the class of lock-free but not wait free algorithms?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk