Re: [boost] [preprocessor][dmc] improved dmc conformance

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-21 07:12:09

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Jody Hagins wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:20:36 -0600
>> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Walter says he became so frustrated with preprocessor bug reports
>>> that he rewrote it from the ground up. Good work! ;-)
>>
>>
>> I'm guessing that he could've used wave, and saved a lot of work,
>> right?
>
> I know he looked at Wave. I think that after conformance, speed, rather than
> extensibility, was his most important criterion.
>
> I also have the feeling he enjoyed the rewrite ;-)

I also have a feeling that DMC isn't conforming enough to compile Wave
;-)

http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/wave.html

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com