Re: [boost] [scope_guard] New revision available+ namingconsideration

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 14:54:22

"Rob Stewart" <stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:200509221909.j8MJ9RKg013387_at_shannonhoon.balstatdev.susq.com...
> From: "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]>
>> "Thore Karlsen" <sid_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>
>> How about  :
>>
>> guard.up();
>> guard.down();
>
>   ...
>   xyz.up();
>   ...
>   xyz.down();
>
> Out of context, and without a variable including (if not ending
> with) "guard," "up" and "down" don't fit well.

Is this not this variable always going to be called guard?(For example see 
ScopeGuardTest.cpp in the distro)  I assume theres only ever one per scope 
Whatever I guess that these wont work either for the same reason.

xyz.on();
xyz.off();

regards
Andy Little