Re: [boost] [scope_guard] New revision available+ namingconsideration

From: Thore Karlsen (sid_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 15:21:02

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:54:22 +0100, "Andy Little"
<andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>>> How about  :
>>>
>>> guard.up();
>>> guard.down();

>>   ...
>>   xyz.up();
>>   ...
>>   xyz.down();
>>
>> Out of context, and without a variable including (if not ending
>> with) "guard," "up" and "down" don't fit well.

>Is this not this variable always going to be called guard?(For example see 
>ScopeGuardTest.cpp in the distro)  I assume theres only ever one per scope 

No, I routinely have more than one guard per scope.

-- 
Be seeing you.