Re: [boost] [scope_guard] Naming roundup

From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-23 15:28:12

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>> So, there was a really interesting and hot discussion about namings.
>>> Many opinions were expressed and I'd like to make some roundup.
>>
>> I still think that the question "should X be included at all" is
>> slightly more fundamental than "should X be named rearm, protect, or
>> on". But this may be just me.
>
> It's not _just_ you.  I definitely agree.  Why hasn't Peter's question
> been addressed?

I guess I've missed it somewhere in the thread. I have given the example in 
the post nearby.