Re: [boost] [scope_guard] Naming roundup

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-23 14:46:54

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> So, there was a really interesting and hot discussion about namings.
>> Many opinions were expressed and I'd like to make some roundup.
>
> I still think that the question "should X be included at all" is slightly 
> more fundamental than "should X be named rearm, protect, or on". But this 
> may be just me. 

It's not _just_ you.  I definitely agree.  Why hasn't Peter's question
been addressed?
 
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com