From: Simon Buchan (simon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 20:25:53
Cory Nelson wrote:
> Umm.. what are you refering to?
> On 9/28/05, Simon Buchan <simon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>So, is any code written for this? Raw code is easier to critique, even
>>if it's just proof-of-concept stuff.
>>Of course, I'd be happy to do some work for this, if we ever agree what
>>to do :D
The topic above? With all those responses about small details of a
(presumably) unwritten library?
A: Because it's hard to read
Q: Why shouldn't I reply above a message?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk