Re: [boost] Show me the Code! - To proposed color lib, that is

From: Simon Buchan (simon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-29 00:06:54

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Simon Buchan wrote:
> 
>>Cory Nelson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Umm.. what are you refering to?
>>>
>>>On 9/28/05, Simon Buchan <simon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>So, is any code written for this?  Raw code is easier to critique, even
>>>>if it's just proof-of-concept stuff.
>>>>Of course, I'd be happy to do some work for this, if we ever agree what
>>>>to do :D
>>>>
>>
>>The topic above?  With all those responses about small details of a 
>>(presumably) unwritten library?
>>
>>A: Because it's hard to read
>>Q: Why shouldn't I reply above a message?
> 
> 
> Because you removed all traces on the subject and in the content to give 
> others any idea of what you are talking about. This is an email forum 
> and many people don't see the thread context, and hence can't tell that 
> you replied to a particular message. Next time it would be wise to 
> include some context if you want to increase the likelihood of sensible 
> responses.
> 
Right.  I didn't realise that this was how threadless views did this. 
Sorry, won't happen again.  Since I replied to the initial colour lib 
(since it wasn't related to the rest of the discussion), and it was 
empty by a OP mistake, I didn't have anything to quote.

So, more on topic: is an actual implementation of the proposed color lib 
in development? ie. is there any code that I can compile and take a look 
at the decisions being made in context?