Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-29 11:05:37


> Dumping objects ->
> {150} normal block at 0x003163F8, 12 bytes long.
> Data: <long double > 6C 6F 6E 67 20 64 6F 75 62 6C 65 00
> {149} normal block at 0x003163C0, 8 bytes long.
> Data: < c1 0a1 > F8 63 31 00 30 61 31 00
> {139} normal block at 0x00316168, 7 bytes long.
> Data: <double > 64 6F 75 62 6C 65 00
> {138} normal block at 0x00316130, 8 bytes long.
> Data: <ha1 `41 > 68 61 31 00 60 34 31 00
> {126} normal block at 0x00313498, 6 bytes long.
> Data: <float > 66 6C 6F 61 74 00
> {125} normal block at 0x00313460, 8 bytes long.
> Data: < 41 > 98 34 31 00 00 00 00 00
> Object dump complete.
> Build log was saved at
> "file://c:\temp\boost_test_library\Debug\BuildLog.htm"
> test_fp_comparisons - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
> ========== Rebuild All: 2 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 skipped ==========
>
> _CONSOLE;WIN32;_DEBUG,BOOST_TEST_NO_AUTO_LINK are defined.
>
> Can anyone throw any light on this please?

I saw these link of leaks with STLPort. My guess is that iostream
implementation is leaking.

Gennadiy


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk