From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-30 08:55:34
Andy Little wrote:
> "Vladimir Prus" wrote
>> Sorry, *that table* does not contain any class names that sound like
>> having to do anything with GUI.
>> The documentation further says: "We have stuff like QThread, QString etc.
>> replacements but nothing GUI-like!". So, no, it's not Qt interface with
>> free license.
I did look there and the interface of the classes is quite different from
Maybe some misunderstanding. Dave's reply quoted this my sentence:
> Long time ago, there was project to reimplement all Qt from scratch,
> under pure GPL license. That project did not produce anything viable,
> to the best of my knowledge.
As I understood him, he though that TnFox is such reimplementation, which it
does not appear to be.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk