From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-30 11:49:59
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Andy Little wrote:
>> "Vladimir Prus" wrote
>>> Sorry, *that table* does not contain any class names that sound like
>>> having to do anything with GUI.
>>> The documentation further says: "We have stuff like QThread, QString etc.
>>> replacements but nothing GUI-like!". So, no, it's not Qt interface with
>>> free license.
> I did look there and the interface of the classes is quite different from
> Maybe some misunderstanding. Dave's reply quoted this my sentence:
> > Long time ago, there was project to reimplement all Qt from scratch,
> > under pure GPL license. That project did not produce anything viable,
> > to the best of my knowledge.
> As I understood him, he though that TnFox is such reimplementation, which it
> does not appear to be.
It appears to claim that it is a Qt reimplementation, FWIW.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk