Re: [boost] [TR1 Review] TR1 Formal Review Beginning

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-30 11:30:21

> Some, but I fear not all, of the C99 and TR1 functions can be
> provided by
> the Cephes library.  I would welcome views on how to deal with the
> ones that are missing (until such time as they be implemented).  One
> could just return
> 0. and still be Standard Compliant, but would throwing an exception
> be more helpful?  If some _exactly_ how and what?  Or should it fail
> at link time?

Compile time preferably: generally speeking the earlier the error the 
better.

Which ones are missing?  Which are the highest priority to implement 
(assuming someone gets the time!) ?

John.