From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-05 13:52:25
On 10/05/2005 01:34 PM, Jose wrote:
> Serialize tables is nice and many memory-based apps can benefit but for most
> databases persistence is a must.
> I agree with previous statement that persistence is the top priority. RML
> has tackled this
> with a separate persist library that provides the persistent STL containers.
Why can't the existing boost serialize library be used instead of a
separate persist library?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk