|
Boost : |
From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-07 10:06:50
On 10/7/05, Asger Mangaard <tmb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> What is discussed in exceptional C++ is the use of the pimpl idiom. The
> library does not implement any of these types, you do. The library just
> eases the underlying work with memory management, etc.
Ergo I restate my case that this library should NOT be called Pimpl. Maybe
PimplHolder or something like that, but calling it Pimpl confuses at least
two people :-)
-- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk