From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-09 13:04:50
On Oct 9, 2005, at 7:36 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> I believe:
> a) that by using derivation similar to demo_fast_archive you can
> all the goals you desire without modification of the library itself.
> b) that this approach will result in smallest amount of additional
> c) that the result will be applicable to current and future archives
> any other coding changes.
Sorry, but I still do not see how this can avoid an MxN problem,
since for each of M archive class I will need to overload the
serialization of N classes. Maybe I am just not seeing a trick that
you have in mind, but I would think that I
- need to overload the serialization for all N classes (array,
vector, valarray, .....) for the demo_fast_archive.
- again overload the serialization for all N classes for the fast
portable binary archive
- again overload the serialization for all N classes for the MPI archive
- again overload the serialization for all N classes for the
and so on...
Can you tell me what I'm missing here?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk