Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-12 23:58:35

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> Wow, that's a little scary.  Was that someone who's generally on the
> ball, or one of those very few who sometimes vociferously object to
> what's being proposed on the grounds that it doesn't do the very thing
> it actually does?

I don't like the direction this is going in. Let's just say that my 
presentation of optional was not detailed enough for people not familiar 
with the concept. Mea culpa.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]